Showing posts with label Purchase. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Purchase. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Longevity insurance: purchase on the risks of life too long

Most people buy life insurance to protect against the risks of dying too soon. Now, there are new products that offer the same protection if you live too long.

He is known as an assurance of longevity, and there is clearly a huge market for it: life expectancy is on the rise fluffy are on the decline and most people do not have enough savings for transport over two decades or more of retirement. This is not lost on the insurance companies, who would like to that you think produces a pension of sorts - although you have bought with your own money.

I wrote on the advantages and disadvantages of the longevity of insurance - which, at its core, is really just an annuity - late last year. But now, New York Life will implement its own version, which he calls an "annuity guaranteed future income", on 11 July.

So how exactly does it work? With immediate basis, also known as pension income, give you a lot of money to an insurance company in exchange for a life income stream that generally begins immediately.

What is different on the products of the life of New York, is that the income stream is deferred - pay you the premium, but accept the flow of income at some point in the future. But there are two distinct ways to use the product.

With the first way, you can think about it as a way to prepay for an annuity (or pension) well before that you plan to use it. Which makes cheaper than a pension with immediate enjoyment, because, well, there's a chance that you will die before you begin to collect. In addition, the insurance company has the advantage of investing your money over a long period of time. You may purchase the annuity at the age of 55, but decide to begin to gather at the age of 67, for example.

But it can also be used as a pure insurance policy - hence the name, longevity insurance. You agree can begin collection of insurance at a date much later in the future, as your 85th anniversary. So if you live past your life expectancy, you are covered. And as most of the people don't know when they will die, this allows you to spend down your retirement savings more liberal because you know that your payments will be kick later. The great risk, of course, is that you will not see a penny because you die until you can collect.

"Mathematically, it's meaningless," said Christopher Blunt, an executive vice president at New York life, referring to the lower cost of the annuity purely as an insurance policy. "It is probably the more efficient and effective way of pure risk off the coast of the table".

So let's examine more closely some of the numbers. It would cost a 55 year old man $100,000 for the purchase of $1,000 per month of income guaranteed for life starting at the age of 65 years, compared to $103 500 for a woman. (It's more expensive for women because their life expectancy is usually longer).

It would cost $ 122 000 to cover the life of the two partners, which is much lower than the $203 000 it would cost to purchase an immediate annuity (at the age of 65).

But if a man chooses to payments over 10 years, invests $10,000 per year, its income stream could be a little less, perhaps more about $880 per month. This is because the insurance company is investing your money for a short period of time (and there is a higher probability you can collect the stream of income with every year passing). Don't forget that your payments will be influenced by the environment of interest rates: if rates rise, you can lock in a higher recovery rate and vice versa.

If you want to use the annuity purely as an insurance policy, it is much cheaper. It would cost a 55 year old man $12 100 to the purchase of $1,000 of guaranteed monthly income that begins at the age of 85 years, compared to $13,750 for a woman. It would cost a 65 year old man, $17 740, while it would cost a woman $ 21 600. To cover both, it would cost $20 340 if they are all two 55 and $31 240 if they have two 65.

Which appears as a decent deal, until you remember that little bug called inflation--your dollars are likely to be worth much less in the future. One option is to know how many you need in inflation-adjusted dollars and buy this amount.

Now for some of the rules of the game: the payment of the initial premium must be at least $10,000, but the subsequent payments may be as little as $100. You can make payments at any time 2 years before starting the collection of payments.

You also have the possibility to change your departure date. So if you were to take early retirement, you could start collecting early, even though your payments would be less. You are also given one shot to the postponement of the date of your departure, if you cannot postpone the beginning of your payments for more than 40 years of your initial payment.

With regard to cost, a single commission as 5% of the amount of the premium is the amount that you are paid in the end.

There are of course risks associated with an annuity. The most obvious is that you give control of a big pile of money, and you may not live long enough to collect. You have the opportunity to purchase survivor benefits, but which will reduce your monthly payments. For example, you can arrange you for a beneficiary to receive money if you have not started to receive payments, or to continue to receive payments for a certain period of time.

And then there is the question of inflation. You can also buy an option that will allow your payments to a certain percentage each year, but yet again, it will cost. (There is also a feature in which said that if rates rise more than two percentage points within five years of the purchase of the contract, the company will reset your contract to the highest current rate).

And then there is always the question of the financial stability of the insurance company several years in the future. Mr. Blunt noted ratings to triple-A New York of the life of each major rating agencies and said the company 30 billion dollars in reserves of life insurance on people more than 65 years and 5 billion dollars in reserves on individual annuities. And, since the company is a mutual (as opposed to a publicly traded company), he said that he could store as much capital as it necessary since he was not beholden to Wall Street and shareholders.

But what happens if Merck invents the magic pill and we all live up to 105? "Continuous improvement in medicine that allow people to live longer could create losses on our individual Annuity business," he said, "but it would be more than offset by the gains on life insurance higher.". But, he added, if something like that happen, "at a given time, the capacity could be limited."

What is the big reason you would or would not purchase this annuity guaranteed future income?



View the original article here



Monday, April 23, 2012

New Treasury Rules Ease Purchase of Annuity With 401(k)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
It is one of the biggest conundrums of an aging society: Americans have salted away $11 trillion in retirement plans, yet millions still risk running out of money in old age.

On Thursday the government said it had some new tools to deal with the problem. The Treasury issued several new regulations intended to make it easier, and maybe cheaper, for middle-class people in retirement to transfer the money they accumulated in their 401(k)s into an annuity that would guarantee monthly payments until they die.

“Having the ability to choose from expanded options will help retirees and their families achieve both greater value and security,” said Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner.

The Labor Department also said it had completed rules to let workers learn about the fees various financial firms charge for helping to run 401(k) plans. Labor officials said they thought employers could negotiate better terms if the details were more easily available.

The risk of outliving one’s assets has moved front and center in recent years, as companies have frozen or ended their traditional, defined-benefit pension plans and replaced them with 401(k) plans. Traditional pension plans offer what is, in fact, an annuity, a stream of guaranteed payments from retirement to death. But fewer and fewer employers want to be running an annuity business on the side.

Insurance companies, on the other hand, are eager to wade into what they consider a big and attractive market of graying Americans with I.R.A. and 401(k) balances and little idea of what to do with them. But they have held back, in part, because of tax rules, which Treasury is easing.

One of the changes proposed Thursday would make it easier for employers to work with annuity providers, so that workers can learn about their annuity options at work, rather than having to go to a financial planner or broker.

“I’m trying not to jump up and down in my office, actually,” said Jody Strakosch, national director of annuities for MetLife, who was asked about the new rules while she was reading the 47-page tome from Treasury.

She said MetLife had had suitable annuity contracts available since 2004, but had been selling them mostly to the retail market and not to employers who offer retirement savings plans.

J. Mark Iwry, an official at the Treasury department, said the department hoped in particular to foster a workplace market for “longevity insurance,” something much discussed in policy circles but that employers rarely make available to workers when they retire.

Longevity insurance consists of an annuity whose stream of payments does not start until the retiree is well into retirement — say, 80 or 85 years old. That is the point where policy makers think many will need the money, because they will have exhausted their savings or developed costly health problems. The insurance would kick in and supplement Social Security. Like Social Security, the longevity insurance payments would keep coming every month until the retiree’s death. But because the policy would pay nothing in the first 15 to 20 years of a person’s retirement, it would cost much less than a conventional annuity.

A white paper by the Council of Economic Advisors estimated, for example, that a 65-year-old would have to pay $277,500 for a $20,000-a-year annuity that started immediately, but only $35,200 for one that started at age 85.

With a price so much lower than a conventional annuity, employees would be able to buy longevity insurance to cover their riskiest years with just a portion of their 401(k) account balance.

Most employers that offer annuities give retiring workers an either-or choice: the whole balance as a big check, or the whole thing to buy an annuity. Tax rules make it complicated to calculate the values if the amount is split, so those rules are being relaxed.

When the federal employees’ Thrift Savings Plan let people spend just part of their balance on longevity insurance, there was an increase in participation.

“They found a dramatic pickup in the number of people who were able to take a partial annuity,” said Ms. Strakosch. (MetLife provides the Thrift Savings Plan’s annuities.)

The Treasury also capped the maximum amount of retirement plan money that could be spent on longevity insurance at 25 percent of the account balance, up to $100,000. Mr. Iwry said that would keep high earners from improperly sheltering money, and minimize any effect of the changes on federal tax revenue.

Treasury is also changing the way of calculating required minimum distributions — the amounts that people over 70 are required to withdraw from their 401(k) plans every year. The new method would exclude any money that went to an insurance company to buy longevity insurance or an annuity.

Some of the rules take effect immediately; other changes are in the public comment period.



View the original article here